<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dave Barry in Cyberspace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emmaline1138.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/dave-barry-in-cyberspace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emmaline1138.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/dave-barry-in-cyberspace/</link>
	<description>&#34;But now he had these words, these words like drums and singing and magic. These words and the strange, strange story out of which they were taken...&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:05:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: emmaline1138</title>
		<link>http://emmaline1138.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/dave-barry-in-cyberspace/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>emmaline1138</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 11:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emmaline1138.wordpress.com/?p=137#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Aw, thanks! Yeah, I have no idea why, but I&#039;ve always been interested in classic literature. I have a old journal entry from when I was 14 of all the books I wanted to read eventually and it was pretty much the same stuff - Beowulf, Ivanhoe, The Divine Comedy, etc. I can&#039;t quite explain it, but it just fascinates me! Movies are more where I just like to enjoy myself and eat popcorn.I&#039;m a sucker for action/adventure/explosions/one-liners/dinosaurs/robots. (That said, TERMINATOR RULES! =P T2 more so than T1, however. Never bothered with T3.)

Ooh, what kind of sci-fi books have you been reading? I haven&#039;t read much of that genre yet, but I still like it a lot and would like to read more. =)

Thanks for stopping by, glad to hear from you again! =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw, thanks! Yeah, I have no idea why, but I&#8217;ve always been interested in classic literature. I have a old journal entry from when I was 14 of all the books I wanted to read eventually and it was pretty much the same stuff &#8211; Beowulf, Ivanhoe, The Divine Comedy, etc. I can&#8217;t quite explain it, but it just fascinates me! Movies are more where I just like to enjoy myself and eat popcorn.I&#8217;m a sucker for action/adventure/explosions/one-liners/dinosaurs/robots. (That said, TERMINATOR RULES! =P T2 more so than T1, however. Never bothered with T3.)</p>
<p>Ooh, what kind of sci-fi books have you been reading? I haven&#8217;t read much of that genre yet, but I still like it a lot and would like to read more. =)</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by, glad to hear from you again! =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Masters (JAM)</title>
		<link>http://emmaline1138.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/dave-barry-in-cyberspace/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>John Masters (JAM)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 16:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emmaline1138.wordpress.com/?p=137#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Em, glad to see you back in the game.

I&#039;ve been really slow posting of late, but still at it for the most part.

I&#039;ve gone back and read your posts and I must say that you have done much better than I ever have.  

About 15 years ago I took it upon myself to read some classics and get a bunch of the &quot;must read&quot; books from history under my belt.

My Mother In Law had a bunch of books from one of those old book clubs where you got a new book every month and they were all from the &quot;Greatest Books of ALL Time&quot; collection.  (Though I have no idea who got to choose the greatest books of all time.

From her collection I decided on Anna Karenina first.

I have long had a personal 100 page go-no go policy.  If the book is lame, or I just flat didn&#039;t like it, I would stop and put the book down.  But I would give it at least 100 pages, in case the book was a slow start.  This policy has worked well, but I must admit if the writing or story is pitiful, I&#039;ll stop before 100 pages and stop wasting time.

Anna Karenina&#039;s first 100 pages was a struggle for the ages between me giving a man like Tolstoy the full benefit of 100 pages to win me over, or on the other hand, protecting my sanity from having to be put into a straight jacket and a rubber room.

I gave Mr. Tolstoy 100 pages and he took from me a couple of hours I&#039;ll never have back.  If I&#039;m not mistaken, the same they were in the same scene as page 1 when they were on page 100.  (or it just seemed that way to me) But, I was a bit older and wiser after that.

So my foray into the world of classic literature lasted exactly 100 pages.  I almost cheered when I finished page 100 and slammed the book shut as if I had just completed a marathon.

I went back to reading strictly for entertainment, whether it be fiction or non-fiction.  I MUST like it or I put it down.  That&#039;s my loss.

Hats off to you for doing what I could not do and finish that book.

I still read a lot.  For me, Tolstoy was not a pleasure.  I guess I&#039;ll go to the grave without having read many of the classics other than what was assigned over the years in my schooling.

I&#039;m glad you&#039;re able to churn through stuff like that.

I&#039;ve mostly been on a science fiction kick for about 6 months now.  It kinda freaked out Lovely Wife because I had only read maybe 3 sci-fi books up until then.  And all of a sudden I was coming home from the library with 8 to 10 sci-fi books and reading roughly 5-6 of them (the rest were too terrible to read) and go back for more.

I had gotten sick of the same old thrillers and mysteries; it&#039;s as if all the different story lines have been written and everyone just writes the same stories over in a different style.

Sorry to ramble, but it&#039;s cool you found a niche that works for you and are keeping at it in the blog world.

I&#039;ve thought of writing about books I&#039;ve read but haven&#039;t done it.  I just haven&#039;t cared enough lately to do it I guess.  (Bad blogger! Bad boy!)

At any rate, hello, and to quote the great philosopher, Terminator model T1000, &quot;I&#039;ll be back.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Em, glad to see you back in the game.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been really slow posting of late, but still at it for the most part.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve gone back and read your posts and I must say that you have done much better than I ever have.  </p>
<p>About 15 years ago I took it upon myself to read some classics and get a bunch of the &#8220;must read&#8221; books from history under my belt.</p>
<p>My Mother In Law had a bunch of books from one of those old book clubs where you got a new book every month and they were all from the &#8220;Greatest Books of ALL Time&#8221; collection.  (Though I have no idea who got to choose the greatest books of all time.</p>
<p>From her collection I decided on Anna Karenina first.</p>
<p>I have long had a personal 100 page go-no go policy.  If the book is lame, or I just flat didn&#8217;t like it, I would stop and put the book down.  But I would give it at least 100 pages, in case the book was a slow start.  This policy has worked well, but I must admit if the writing or story is pitiful, I&#8217;ll stop before 100 pages and stop wasting time.</p>
<p>Anna Karenina&#8217;s first 100 pages was a struggle for the ages between me giving a man like Tolstoy the full benefit of 100 pages to win me over, or on the other hand, protecting my sanity from having to be put into a straight jacket and a rubber room.</p>
<p>I gave Mr. Tolstoy 100 pages and he took from me a couple of hours I&#8217;ll never have back.  If I&#8217;m not mistaken, the same they were in the same scene as page 1 when they were on page 100.  (or it just seemed that way to me) But, I was a bit older and wiser after that.</p>
<p>So my foray into the world of classic literature lasted exactly 100 pages.  I almost cheered when I finished page 100 and slammed the book shut as if I had just completed a marathon.</p>
<p>I went back to reading strictly for entertainment, whether it be fiction or non-fiction.  I MUST like it or I put it down.  That&#8217;s my loss.</p>
<p>Hats off to you for doing what I could not do and finish that book.</p>
<p>I still read a lot.  For me, Tolstoy was not a pleasure.  I guess I&#8217;ll go to the grave without having read many of the classics other than what was assigned over the years in my schooling.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re able to churn through stuff like that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve mostly been on a science fiction kick for about 6 months now.  It kinda freaked out Lovely Wife because I had only read maybe 3 sci-fi books up until then.  And all of a sudden I was coming home from the library with 8 to 10 sci-fi books and reading roughly 5-6 of them (the rest were too terrible to read) and go back for more.</p>
<p>I had gotten sick of the same old thrillers and mysteries; it&#8217;s as if all the different story lines have been written and everyone just writes the same stories over in a different style.</p>
<p>Sorry to ramble, but it&#8217;s cool you found a niche that works for you and are keeping at it in the blog world.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve thought of writing about books I&#8217;ve read but haven&#8217;t done it.  I just haven&#8217;t cared enough lately to do it I guess.  (Bad blogger! Bad boy!)</p>
<p>At any rate, hello, and to quote the great philosopher, Terminator model T1000, &#8220;I&#8217;ll be back.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
